[–]/r/animecirclejerk[M] sent 2 hours ago:

Defending lolicon.

Yeah so I was permabanned again. Whatdefending pedophiles is a bad thing to do? Well I agree! But why though?

Here’s the full scoop!

I am sorry that you missed the point. I am not defending lolicon. I challenged the premises of the specific arguments presented in the thread, courteously. It seems that if someone is making a broad sweeping claim with great confidence and then instantly call the cops if they are faced with criticism, then maybe they shouldn’t be on the stage. Lawyers argue for their clients without condoning the crimes or being criminals themselves. This is obviously not a courtroom, and I am not a lawyer, but as a citizen I feel it’s pretty unsound to assume guilt by association and silence people for saying anything that challenges their beliefs.

I am sorry but then you missed the point. I am not defending lolicon. I challenged the premises of the specific arguments presented in the thread, courteously. It seems that if someone is making a broad sweeping claim with great confidence and then instantly call the cops if they are faced with criticism, then maybe they shouldn’t be on the stage. Lawyers argue for their clients without condoning the crimes or being criminals themselves. This is obviously not a courtroom, and I am not a lawyer, but as a citizen I feel it’s pretty unsound to assume guilt by association and silence people for saying anything that challenges their beliefs.

Lawyers argue for their clients without condoning the crimes or being criminals themselves. This is obviously not a courtroom, and I am not a lawyer, but as a citizen I feel it’s pretty unsound to assume guilt by association and silence people for saying anything that challenges their beliefs.

I am sorry but you missed the point. I am not defending lolicon. I challenged the premises of the specific arguments presented in the thread, courteously. It seems that if someone is making a broad sweeping claim with great confidence and then instantly call the authorities when faced with criticism, then maybe they shouldn’t get on stage.

Lawyers argue for their clients without condoning the crimes or being criminals themselves. This is obviously not a courtroom, and I am not a lawyer, but as a citizen I feel it’s pretty unsound to assume guilt by association and silence people for saying anything that challenges their beliefs.

“She’s a witch!”

“Is witchcraft even real?”

“It’s real enough to us! Burn them both!”

Still though, thanks for even answering me instead of just report me to the admins, FBI, and NATO high command. It’d suck to live in a country like Russia or China where that’s the norm, so maybe we should be more tolerant of dissenting opinons lest we become like them, yeah?

But that’s just my opinion. Peace.